Best Web Hosting Companies for 2021 (No. 1 is our favourite) - Hostingpill

De beste webhotellfirmaene for 2021 (nr. 1 er vår favoritt)

Our Hosting Experts independently test and recommend the best hosting; you can learn more about our review process here. We may receive commissions on purchases made from some of these links.

Want to know the answer right away?

anbefaltBlueHostpå lindex.com

BlueHost

Based on our extensive testing and experience, the best web hosting is BlueHost.

From the title, you may think: What does Best Web Hosting veldig slemt?

  • Is it affordable pricing?
  • Is it a 99.9% uptime guarantee?
  • Or is it great security and customer support?

Our answer: A bit of everything

There are so many web hosting services out there that choosing is risky. You can find a web host that is very inexpensive, but does a terrible job keeping your site up.

Du kan også finne en kostbar webhotellpakke som ser ut som den vil gi premium service, men ikke har funksjonene du trenger.

No need to worry:

We have tried and tested over 100 web hosting services, (and counting) have helped 2,158+ bloggers and businesses select their suitable choice of hosting service.

Basert på den erfaringen, og tatt hensyn til viktige faktorer som ytelse, pris, funksjoner, support og mer, har vi funnet fem gode verter som står øverst.

Best Web Hosting Services

Uten videre, la oss dykke ned i en detaljert gjennomgang av hvert webhotell.

1. Bluehost (Beste samlet)

bluehost hjemmeside

Bluehost Pros
  • Uptime has been excellent lately.
  • Generelt god fordeling av ressurser.
  • Bluehost er veldig enkel å bruke, og er flott for nybegynnere.
  • Utrolig god kundesupport.
Bluehost Ulemper
  • Uptime was a tad poorer prior to a year, and response times aren’t special.
  • Ja, funksjoner og ressurser er generelt gode, men noen ting kan legges til andre eller tredje nivå, etter min mening, for å holde opp med tunge konkurrenter.
Why we recommend Bluehost?

Av alle navnene på denne listen, Bluehost er sannsynligvis den mest populære.

It’s one of the most popular hosts around, in the big leagues of hosting: around since 2003, Bluehost har mer enn 2 millioner nettsteder og har hundrevis av supportmedarbeidere klare til å gå.

jeg skjønner BluehostDen viktigste appellen til å være en samlet stor webhotell som er brukervennlig. Det presterer bra, det prising er overordnet standard, og den har stor brukervennlighet og kundestøtte.bluehost fly

Selv om lagringsplassen ikke er ubegrenset, slik den er med GreenGeeks, Vil jeg minne deg på den nevnte leilighetsanalogien: Hvis alle på en delt hostingkonto bestemte seg for å bruke opp så mye lagringsplass som muligens fordi det er "ubegrenset", ville ikke hele den delte hostingplattformen fungert.

Så ja, Bluehost begrenser deg teknisk, men praktisk talt er lagringskvotene ganske sjenerøse, spesielt for en kontonivå. I tillegg er det SSD-lagring, ikke HD-lagring.

Utenom det får du uovervåket båndbredde, grunnleggende SSL, et inkludert domene, noen parkerte domener og ett nettsted. Høyere nivåer får mer av alt, pluss markedsføringstilbud og noe sikkerhetskopi av nettstedet.

Disse funksjonene er ærlig generøse nok for de fleste brukere, selv om de ikke ser så imponerende ut på papiret. Når det er sagt, tror jeg det Bluehost kan være litt mer sjenerøs å følge med på noen av sine mindre konkurrenter, som GreenGeeks or FastComet (som kommer opp neste!).

For eksempel inkludert sikkerhetskopier eller flere nettsteder for kontoer på inngangsnivå ville være fint.

Noe Bluehost er spesielt bra er brukervennlighet. Selv om alle vertene på denne listen er grunnleggende enkle å bruke, Bluehost er spesielt sterk her.

Nettstedsbyggeren er intuitiv og Bluehost er trygg på at du kan prøve det gratis på deres hjemmeside.

Den generelle utformingen og kontostyringen er veldig strømlinjeformet og enkel å bruke. Kundestøtten er utmerket: representanter er veldig hjelpsomme og kunnskapsbasen er ekspansiv.bluehost support resources

Så langt oppetiden går, Bluehost isn’t number one. However, throughout 2018-2019 Bluehost was usually at 99.99% or 100% uptime.

Unfortunately, some months were poorer:

bluehost old uptime

But more recently, Bluehost has been better. Take a look at the last year:bluehost oppetid

That’s nearly 99.99% over the course of a whole YEAR straight. That means that the uptime has been VERY consistently high lately.

Unfortunately, the response times aren’t as good as the uptime, historically or recently. They’re not super slow, but about average or on the higher side of average.

For å være en samlet stor vert med anstendig priser, god ytelse, solide funksjoner og stor brukervennlighet og støtte, Bluehost has earned our first place on our GoDaddy Alternatives.

On the off chance that if you’re already on the other side with GoDaddy then we have a comprehensive guide that’ll get you over from GoDaddy til BlueHost enkelt.

Fortsatt nysgjerrig på Bluehost? Vi har deg dekket.

2. FastComet

fastcomet hjemmeside

FastComet Pros
  • Excellent budget option for those who want many features for low cost (for the first term).
  • The entry-level option in particular is one of the most well-featured first tier web hosting packages I’ve seen.
  • The second and third tier have advanced features that are uncommon even for other companies’ higher tiers.
FastComet Ulemper
  • Uptime and response times aren’t as good as some of the other options here.
  • Noen lagringsgrenser til og med på høyere nivåer.
  • Used to not have higher renewal prices, but changed its pricing model. So it’s less of a bargain than it used to be.
Why we recommend FastComet?

FastComet starter på $ 2.95, som ligger i den nedre enden av gjennomsnittet, og strekker seg langs tre nivåer til $ 5.95.fastcomet fly

You get pretty much every feature that is common on other hosts:fastcomet egenskaper

But you also get some features that are less common on other hosting companies, especially for the price points.

For example, the first tier has unlimited email accounts, unlimited databases, unlimited FTP accounts, BitNinja Server Security, free CloudFlare CDN, SSL, and daily backups:fastcomet important features

These are strong features for a first tier. There’s also a website builder included.

The second and third tiers pile on even more features, especially ones related to performance. For example, the second tier and third tier include this:fastcomet avanserte funksjoner

And the third tier comes with this:fastcomet rocket booster features

Plus all the other stuff I showed you.

So FastComet is clearly loaded with features, and is in fact one of the strongest candidates on this list if you’re prioritizing features and performance boosts on higher tiers.

It makes the prices very reasonable. The first term prices are excellent bargains/value purchases given the features.

Unfortunately, they do renew at higher (but reasonable) cost. FastComet didn’t use to have higher renewals, so the change is unfortunate.

Nonetheless, it’s a very solid set of hosting packages.

Plus, in my experience, FastComet is easy to use, has great customer support, and good security.

So what’s the problem? For people who want shared hosting options, isn’t FastComet the pinnacle? After all, it is easily a great bargain in terms of features and price.

Samtidig som FastComet is a great deal, it falls short on the most important item in hosting: the actual hosting!

FastComet is overall fine, but in my experience, historically the uptime was a bit worse than some of the others here, and the response time was too. .

More recently (in the last year or so) this trend has held up:fastcomet oppetid

There are many days where uptime drops below 99.95%, and below 99.9%. Most of the days are good, but the drops happen often enough.

So even the last three months have also been at the 99% mark overall.

While the response time and uptime aren’t the end of the world, it does make me think FastComet isn’t the best for those who are strongly prioritizing performance.

But for anyone willing to risk these numbers, and looking for a very cost-effective solution, FastComet is probably going to be your number one pick.

Hvis du vil vite mer først, vår FastComet gjennomgang har mer informasjon, pluss en enda lengre oppetidspost for å sjekke ut.

3. TMDHosting

TMDhosting homapage

TMDHosting Pros
  • Great speeds, consistently
  • Choice of Linux or Windows based hosting
  • Low renewal/regular prices
  • Pretty good feature set, especially Weebly’s website builder.
  • Detailed tutorials for a range of open source software and content management systems.
TMDHosting Ulemper
  • Uptime suffers a bit
  • Knowledge base is weak, as it’s basically a forum and thus less organized, and with less official input.
Why we recommend TMDHosting?

If you like to pay attention to underdog and lesser-known hosting companies, you’ll want to pay extra-close attention to this one.

TMDHosting has built a strong reputation, and since its founding in 2007, it’s received many impressive accolades.

TMDHosting is also a bit unique for its focus on hosting open-source software. It’s been credited by several content management systems (CMS) for being a great host through the years.

But now? Let’s take a look.

The first thing you might notice is that TMDHosting offers both Linux and Windows-based options. This is less common for shared web hosting, but it’s a welcome choice.

Windows hosting is a bit more expensive, but proportionately has more generous features. To keep things simple, I’ll focus on the Linux shared hosting.

TMDhoating plan

The promotional/first-term prices are pretty normal. Good, but normal. But take a look at those regular prices:

They’re noticeably cheaper than most regular prices. So in the long term. TMDHosting is actually cheaper than many competing hosts.

And as for the features:

TMDhosting egenskaper

They’re pretty generous, as neither storage nor bandwidth has caps at any tier.

Most of the other stuff is basic at the first tier, but the money-back guarantee is longer (which shows confidence on TMDHosting’s part) and basic caching speeds things up.

But the Weebly website builder is great. Several options here include their own website builders for free.

That’s great, but many hosting companies’ native website builders are a bit sub-par. Weebly is a company wholly dedicated to making a great website builder. So its inclusion here is extra impressive.

Anyway, the second and third tiers are also impressive for adding performance-enhancing features.

Lastly, the shared plans come with free daily backups, and are more isolated than traditional shared hosting.

So just looking at prices and features, TMD looks excellent.

But let’s take a look at the performance. We’ve been testing TMD Hosting since early 2019 (alle detaljer her).

Through half of 2019, TMD’s month-to-month uptime was kind of shoddy. Three months were well-below 99.9% uptime.

But the last year has been a bit better:

TMDhosting oppetid

Typically, most days will be at 100%, but then a few days will consistently fall below the 99.9% mark.

The last three months, for example, has averaged 99.92%.

So that’s not ideal. But there IS good news:

The response times have been GREAT. In fact, they have been, without fail, among the lowest of all the hosts we’ve tested, and have been so consistently since early 2019.

Du kan sjekke ut our full analysis of TMDHosting her. if this caught your eye.

4. DreamHost

dreamhost hjemmeside

DreamHost Pros
  • Uptime-garanti vil kreditere deg for nedetid
  • For det meste god oppetid
  • Fleksibel priser gir mulighet for månedlige betalinger i stedet for forpliktelser i et år eller tre år
  • Veldig WordPress-vennlig, spesielt for nybegynnere: WordPress er forhåndsinstallert, en gratis migreringsplugin er inkludert, og en WP-nettstedbygger er inkludert gratis
  • Også automatiske sikkerhetskopier for WordPress-nettsteder
  • En av de lengste pengene-tilbake-garantiene jeg har sett, på 97 dager
DreamHost Ulemper
  • E-postadresse er ikke gratis for det første nivået
  • Bruker et tilpasset kontrollpanel i stedet for den mer vanlige cPanel, som kan kaste bort noen brukere (men dette er et veldig lite poeng)
  • Bare to prisplaner, som ikke er like bra hvis du vil ha mange alternativer
  • Generelt, mens DreamHost er flott hvis du vil ha billig hosting for WordPress, det er mer vanlig når det gjelder generell delt hosting
  • Downtime is rare but CAN be pretty bad when it happens
Why we recommend DreamHost?

DreamHost er et annet hovednavn i verdenen av webhotell, med god grunn.

Som du ser på bildet over, DreamHost har mer enn 1.5 millioner nettsteder - og legger den inn i de store ligaene med delt webhotell sammen med Bluehost og GoDaddy.

DreamHost er samlet sett solid for de som ønsker en rimelig, høytytende webhotell med solide funksjoner.

Bare så vi er klare, er dette de grunnleggende funksjonene og prisene vi ser på:dreamhost fly

People looking into WordPress will feel right at home. DreamHost is 2nd place in our Best Wordpress Hosting Services. Som Bluehost, DreamHost is one of the three major hosts that WordPress.Org itself recommends.

Som du kan se, DreamHost har ganske mange funksjoner designet for å gjøre ting enklere for WordPress-brukere - for eksempel en gratis migreringsplugin for folk som bruker WordPress på en tidligere vert, en gratis nettstedbygger for WordPress og forhåndsinstallasjon av WordPress.

På toppen av det, DreamHost har anstendig prising, i det generelle utvalget av hva de fleste webhotellene tilbyr, men litt på undersiden.

Og som en ekstra bonus, DreamHost har månedlige betalingsplaner for de som ikke ønsker å forplikte seg til et år foran.

Så langt ytelsen går, DreamHost er ganske bra. De garanterer 100% oppetid og vil kreditere deg for visse mengder driftsstans.

Men DreamHoster den faktiske oppetiden? Litt mer komplisert. Sjekk det ut:

dreamhost 12 months uptime

Vanligvis DreamHost does indeed offer 100% uptime. But there was one day in February and a day in January that threw off our average..

There was also one day in late August where uptime dipped to about 96%. But aside from those days, almost EVERY day has been at 100%.

Så, DreamHost still has pretty solid uptime. As you’d guess, days like that are rare.

Du kan se våre fulle DreamHost oppetidstatistikk her. Og du kan lese min fulle evaluering av DreamHost her. for mer generell informasjon.

5. A2 Hosting

A2 Hosting hjemmeside

A2 Hosting Pros
  • Consistently good uptime
  • Perhaps the best feature set of all the items here
  • First-term prices are decent, making the features even more impressive
  • Good customer support: representatives are responsive and helpful, and knowledge base has good articles for getting started
A2 Hosting Ulemper
  • Renewal/regular prices are on the higher side of average
  • Doesn’t cater as strongly to ease of use or simplicity as some other options here
  • Domains not included for free, and if you purchase them on A2, they’re more expensive than usual anyway
Why we recommend A2 Hosting?

A2 Hosting isn’t a super famous host, but it’s got a well-established reputation in the hosting industry, and it’s been around for a little while (2001).

It offers a range of hosting products, but its shared hosting is especially good.

There are four web hosting options offered by A2:

A2 Hosting fly

The price range is pretty standard, but a bit higher at regular rates/upon renewal.

The resources and features are pretty impressive. For example, just the first plan gets 100GB of storage—that’s a lot for just one website at a few bucks a month.

But there’s more. ALL tiers (including the first tier) comes with all this:A2 Hosting egenskaper

That’s pretty good. To be specific, website staging (which lets you create a clone site to experiment with big changes) is usually for advanced plans.

Additionally, CloudFlare CDN (boosting performance), choice of data center location, and a website builder—all included for free—are great adds. All these features make the first tier loaded.

But the remaining tiers have even more features:

The second plan onwards has free automatic backups, plus no limits on storage or sites. Plus this:

A2 Hosting growth features

Meanwhile, the third and fourth tier get another extra set of features:A2 Hosting turbo features

And that’s on top of the basic features/resource upgrades that come with the plans, which I already showed you.

So A2 is absolutely loaded with features, more than most hosts, and the cost is only a bit higher than a lot of the competition long term. And about the same at first buy!

Performance is key now.

We’ve been testing out A2 Hosting for a long time. Some months in 2017-2018 had sub-average uptime (the lower side of 99.9%).

But it’s been a long time since such issues have come up.

In particular, the last year has been pretty good:

A2 Hosting oppetid

And the last three months have been even better, at 99.984% uptime.

That’s a pretty strong uptime record, and the best part is that it’s from consistently good uptime.

Some other hosts (including some options here) might not have bad average uptime over a long period, but they fluctuate with some days having a lot of downtime.

The speed isn’t fantastic, but it’s decent. And, while it fluctuates some, it’s relatively consistent overall.

So not only is the performance good, but you can rely on it.

Du kan sjekke ut vår A2 hosting test site for uptime records that go as far back as July 2017, or our A2 review for a holistic look at the company.

6. GoDaddy

GoDaddy hjemmesideYou probably know this, but GoDaddy is a big name in the hosting (and domain) world.

GoDaddy Pros
  • Very good uptime over the course of two years.
  • Similarly good speeds.
  • Promotional prices are low (when they happen)
  • Ability to purchase more resources as needed
  • choice of Windows or Linux hosting
GoDaddy Ulemper
  • Non-promotional prices are higher than average for the first term.
  • A lot of upselling, pushiness to buy add-ons
  • GoDaddy’s live chat is often busy
  • Some included free features renew at cost after the first term
  • Especially: SSL not included for free at first two tiers, and renews at cost for the third tier
Why we recommend GoDaddy?

In fact, it’s almost certainly the biggest hosting company on this list. To put a number on it, GoDaddy services over 20 MILLION customers.

That’s a level above the other big names here (Bluehost og HostGator).

Ennå GoDaddy is also infamous for untransparent pricing and a very corporate approach. That’s also what holds it back on this list.

But it’s been so successful for a reason...it’s good. Check out our full breakdown of GoDaddy her. for mer om det.

Anyway, let’s look at the web hosting plans:GoDaddy fly

The first-term prices are higher than average. But the renewal prices are overall normal (if a bit higher than average as well).

Imidlertid GoDaddy frequently has big promotions that drop the prices to dirt-cheap levels for the first term.

As for the features...the resources are pretty generous. 100GB of storage (SSD by the way) is more than enough for the vast majority of people hosting just one website, and it only gets higher after that.

A cool feature is that you can easily buy more resources—not just storage, but also CPU or RAM—very easily as you need to.

But aside from the good news on resources, that’s about it for features.

Yes, you get a domain with annual plans, but it renews at cost after the first year. To be fair, that’s a common deal. But it renews at a higher cost than average.

Plus, the email has only 5GB of storage and is free for the first year only, but renews at cost.

The SSL? The feature that’s crucial to having a trustworthy site, which is included for free in almost all hosting plans? It’s not included for free for the first two tiers, and renews at cost for the third tier.

Også GoDaddy is constantly upselling. You’re always pushed to purchase add-ons or higher-priced packages.

The website builder is one of those add-ons. Sometimes GoDaddy will even include it for free (for a year) during promotions.

It’s great when hosting companies include their own website builders for free. But many of them are sub-par compared to the popular website building software.

GoDaddy is a bit different. It’s a big company, and has invested into its website builder to be a more mainstream offering.

Du kan sjekke ut our investigation of GoDaddy’s website builder here for more info. But the short version is that yes, it’s pretty good.

Men totalt sett GoDaddy is on the weaker side for features and price.

As for the uptime:

Vi har vært måling GoDaddy through a test site for two years (starting August 2018).

I løpet av den tiden, GoDaddy basically always had great performance. Most months have at least 99.99% uptime, and it’s rare when they don’t.

Alt i alt GoDaddy has done well for the last year. But some instances of downtime have lowered the average:

godaddy oppetid

Most of the time, it’s 100%, but there are consistently days just over 99.9% that lower the average.

In the last three months, however, uptime has been closer to 99.98%, which is good.

Not to mention, the response times have also consistently been low since we started measuring.

So overall, while not perfect, GoDaddy is a pretty good performer and has been such for two years.

7. HostGator

HostGator hjemmeside

HostGator Pros
  • Overall, good uptime, particularly recently
  • Generally good features (including a website builder, unlimited email, etc)
  • Generous resources
  • Lower starting prices and lower renewal prices compared to competitors
  • Solid customer support (both representatives and knowledge base)
HostGator Ulemper
  • Slower response times
  • May be a bit risky for highly important sites/projects that need excellent uptime
  • Some upselling and add-ons that can be frustrating and build cost
Why we recommend HostGator?

HostGator is a very well-established name in the hosting industry. It claims to have hosted over 8 MILLION domains and has hundreds of employees, putting it in the big leagues.

HostGator’s plans are mostly low-cost, and have generous resources:HostGator fly

The main impetus to upgrade would be for more domains, and/or stronger SSL and a dedicated IP.

HostGator has a decent set of features available for all plans:HostGator egenskaper

So proportionately to price, HostGator definitely seems to be on top of things.

And on that note, HostGator has both lower starting prices AND renews at a lower cost than many of its competitors (though you’d have to commit for a long period of time to get those lower prices).

Uansett HostGator seems pretty solid thus far. The key factor now is performance.

I løpet av det siste året, HostGator has overall done well:

HostGator oppetid

It’s been keeping its uptime guarantee of 99.9%. In fact, most of the time it’s easily at 100% uptime or pretty close—there were just a few days where uptime dipped to the lower side of 99.9% that took down the average.

If you look at the last 3 months in particular, it’s pretty good:HostGator 3months uptime

Unfortunately, the response times are on the slower side both overall and recently.

You can check out fully detailed uptime records for our HostGator test site here, going all the way back three years.

Also, you can read vår HostGator gjennomgang for a full run-down of the hosting company.

8. TurnKey Internet

TurnKey Internet hjemmeside

TurnKey Internet Pros
  • Very good uptime, especially lately
  • Consistently great speeds
  • Choice of Windows or Linux hosting
  • Good three-year prices and yearly prices
  • Generous resources
  • Independently owns its data center, which is also a green data center
TurnKey Internet Ulemper
  • Domain name not included
  • Not loaded with features compared to some options here.
  • Particularly, not a lot of features that would appeal to beginners.
  • Knowledge base/informational support a bit limited
Why we recommend TurnKey Internet?

TurnKey’s a less famous host, but it’s been around for quite a while—since 1999, in fact.

Its history is also a little unusual. Unlike just about all the other names here, TurnKey didn’t start as a host.

It first was a consultant for ISPs, and then transitioned to hosting. But its transition has resulted in a pretty impressive hosting company.

TurnKey gives you a choice of Linux hosting (which comes with cPanel) or Windows hosting (which comes with the Plesk control panel).

As is usually the case, the Windows hosting is more expensive:

TurnKey Internet fly

These are pretty friendly to developers and those hosting more dynamic projects.

As for the Linux plans:TurnKey Internet cpanel hosting plan

There are just two options, and they’re pretty low-priced but with generous resources.

However, the price tag for those Linux plans only applies to a three-year pre-payment. This is often the case with hosts.

BUT: even if you pay on a yearly or monthly basis, the prices are still good. This is for the first tier:

TurnKey Internet billing cycle 1

The month-to-month price is pretty standard, but just 5 bucks a month for a year of service is still on the lower side.

So all in all these prices are still good even when you don’t buy three years in bulk.

Moreover, the Windows plans do not have this same disconnect. The price tags shown for Windows here are what you pay month-to-month. If you pay on a yearly basis, it’s marginally cheaper:TurnKey Internet billing cycle 2

So all in all it’s a well-priced set-up.

The features available tend to be more about resources and support for various scripts.

That’s great, but it does matter a little less to people looking for an “easy” and simple host (such people may want website builders included, for example).

But ultimately, the cheapest plan (Linux) can support up to 10 domains and doesn’t cap storage, which is a lot better than most hosts. That’s great value. Uptime will make or break TurnKey now:

So let’s examine the performance. TurnKey’s uptime, over the course of a year, is pretty impressive:TurnKey Internet uptime 12months

There was basically one day with poor uptime, but other than that, it’s been 100% almost every day with minimal exceptions.

To prove it, take a look at the last 3 months, which have a nearly perfect uptime score:TurnKey Internet 3 months uptime

And the speed? The average response time is among the lowest we’ve seen of the hosting companies we’ve measured.

Vi har vært measuring TurnKey since March 2019, and the performance was a bit worse in the middle part of 2019. A couple months were below 99.95%, but not much.

But that hasn’t been an issue for a while, with performance overall looking quite strong (especially lately).

Let’s get to a summary of the pros and cons. But if you’re already really curious, you may as well learn some more about TurnKey with our full review av det.

9. InterServer

interserver hjemmeside

InterServer Pros
  • Very good performance for the last year
  • En størrelse passer alle priser betyr gode funksjoner proporsjonalt med pris
  • Ingen overdrevne fornyelsespriser
  • Spesielt gode standardfunksjoner for sikkerheten til nettstedet
  • Solid kundesupport
  • Delte servere har bare 50% av kapasiteten, noe som gir mulighet for vekst. Dette er mindre vanlig for delte servere.
  • God oppetid og responstid.
InterServer Ulemper
  • Domenet er ikke gratis, selv om det er billig til $ 1.99
  • Selv om jeg personlig liker en enkelt prisplan, vil noen kanskje ha flere alternativer
  • Spottier rekord på oppetid og responstid på lengre sikt (stort sett før august 2019).
Why we recommend Interserver?

InterServer er ikke den mest kjente webverten, men den er fremdeles ganske kjent. Og det skal være:

InterServer har eksistert siden 1999 og har klart å opprettholde et solid omdømme hele tiden.

På pris, InterServer er veldig enkelt. De fleste nettverter, som du sikkert har lagt merke til nå, tilbyr ganske mange lagdelte alternativer. Funksjonene og ytelsen øker jo mer du betaler.

I tillegg fornyes hvert prisnivå til en høyere pris etter første termin, og den lave prisen som annonseres er avhengig av at du registrerer deg i en viss periode.

Med InterServer, det er nettopp EN webhotellpakke. Vanligvis er det $ 4 per måned hvis du forplikter deg til 3 år, eller $ 5 per måned regelmessig. Som du ser er det rabatt i skrivende stund.

Dette er en hosting-pakke som passer til alle størrelser, og som gir mening gitt funksjonene (mer om det på et sekund).

Det er fremdeles en god avtale for prisen, selv om. $ 4- $ 5 i måneden er en smule høyere enn den billigste hosting på inngangsnivå, men det er billigere enn hosting med høyt nivå.

Forholdsmessig sett er det en god pris. Så la oss undersøke hva det tilbyr:

En av de beste tingene om InterServer er at den tilbyr mange funksjoner. Jeg mener, bare se på disse grunnleggende:

interserver egenskaper

Noen av disse forventer du sannsynligvis, som gratis migrasjon, SSL og SSD-lagring.

Men du får også en gratis nettstedbygger, og e-post er ikke engang begrenset for det første nivået. Pokker, lagring er ikke engang begrenset.

Plus, InterServerStandard sikkerhetsfunksjoner - kjent som Intershield Protection - går over normen for delt hosting:

interserver intershield sikkerhet

De har også noe som heter “Inter-Insurance”, som betyr at de vil rydde opp i hackede eller infiserte kontoer - spesielt WordPress-nettsteder - gratis.

Det er en del av InterServerer generelt god kundestøtte. Det er en funksjon i seg selv.

Til slutt, et av de mer unike og fine poengene om InterServer er ressursfordelingen. Jeg har allerede fortalt deg at du får ubegrenset SSD-lagring. Men dette er grunnen til:

interserver server capacity

Avstand mellom kunder på delte planer som dette er mindre vanlig, fordi det selvfølgelig er mindre lønnsomt. Det er mer fornuftig å stappe lite konsumerende kunder sammen.

Men ved å sørge for at hver server kjører på halv kapasitet, InterServer lar kundene få mest mulig ut av delt hosting - med andre selskaper vil de bli tvunget til å oppgradere til en høyere plan hvis de konsumerte for mange ressurser.

Nå, på dette tidspunktet InterServer høres sannsynligvis ut som det ubestridte første alternativet. Ikke så fort:

En av tingene som holder InterServer fra å komme opp høyere på denne listen er ytelse, en avgjørende komponent.

Vi har vært testing InterServer en stund. The newer results are better, but some of the older results still affect the evaluation.

Dette er de eldre resultatene, for omtrent ett år siden:

interserver old uptime

Som du kan se, for et år siden KAN OPTIDEN være fantastisk, men den var ofte ganske lav. Alt under 99.95% er på den dårligere siden av gjennomsnittet, og mai og mars 2019 skiller seg ut.

Responstidene var også ganske trege på sensommeren 2019.

Dette er nyere resultater:

interserver oppetid

Som du ser har responstidene vært veldig raske.

And the uptime has been closer to 99.99% or 100% month to month (99.977% uptime is pretty decent over the course of a whole year).

The uptime and response times have been good for the last year, but earlier in 2019 things have been spottier.

Du kan se alle våre oppetidsposter her, som spenner over mer enn ett år og frem til i dag.

Uansett, det er avtalen med InterServerytelse.

Til syvende og sist InterServer is a great bargain for many looking for affordable hosting that provides good features and still performs very well.

But if your absolute bottom line is having performance as close to perfect as possible, something else on this list may be better.

Du kan lese mer om InterServer her. hvis du fremdeles er usikker.

Are other kinds of web hosting better for me?

Hvis du har lest denne artikkelen 'til nå, og hadde den snikende mistanken om at ingen av disse er det beste alternativet for deg eller din virksomhet ...

Du kan ha rett. Webhotell er bra for mange mennesker, og det er derfor det er så populært, men det er andre typer hosting.

Best web hosting for small businesses:

La oss starte med webhotell for bedrifter. I utgangspunktet er dette fortsatt delt webhotell. Og vanlig delt hosting kan og IS brukes av bedrifter ofte.

But, many hosts offer web hosting that’s better for businesses. And many hosts offer special web hosting plans for businesses—take Hostwinds for eksempel.

Den viktigste fordelen er at du får et bedre kompromiss: flere ressurser, bedre ytelse, men likevel kostnadseffektiviteten og enkel webhotell. For å se mer, sjekk ut min liste over de beste webhotell for bedrifter.

Noen av disse alternativene:

Best WordPress hosting providers:

En annen type hosting som overlapper med delt hosting er WordPress hosting.

Noen WordPress-hosting er i utgangspunktet delt webhotell med ekstra funksjoner. Noen WordPress-hosting er VPS- eller netthosting - mer penger, men også bedre sikkerhet og ytelse.

Den korte versjonen er at WordPress hosting kan referere til forskjellige typer hosting, med den underliggende komponenten selvfølgelig at pakkene er optimalisert for WordPress.

Så hvis du virkelig ønsker en god vert for WordPress generelt, er noen av alternativene på denne listen gode - men det er fortsatt andre der ute, og de er verdt å se nærmere på.

Her er noen av de beste leverandørene av WordPress-hosting, med et øyeblikk:

Beste Drupal hostingleverandører:

WordPress er det mest populære innholdsstyringssystemet, eller CMS, rundt, og det er grunnen til at du allerede har hørt om det.

Men det er andre innholdsstyringssystemer som er veldig kraftige. Drupal er en slik CMS: den er også åpen kildekode og kan brukes på de fleste verter.

Imidlertid er Drupal orientert mot mer avansert nettstedsadministrasjon. Som sådan er noen verter bedre egnet for Drupal.

Her er noen av de beste vertene:

Beste Magento hostingleverandører:

En annen populær CMS er Magento. Magento er for administrasjon av netthandelssteder, og er en av de mest populære e-handelsplattformene i verden.

Et sentralt poeng her, selvfølgelig, er at du kan ha et netthandelssted med noen av webvertene som er oppført her, eller WordPress eller til og med Drupal.

Men Magento er for deg som vil ta ledelsen av netthandelsnettstedet sitt til neste nivå, der hele CMS handler om online virksomhet. Noen verter er naturlig nok bedre for Magento.

Beste Moodle vertsleverandører:

Og hvis du prøver å bygge et pedagogisk nettsted, kan du bruke mer enn en enkel, men kostbar kursbygger - det er til og med et CMS bare for å bygge utdanningssteder fleksibelt.

For det må du bruke Moodleog verter som er spesielt bra for Moodle.

Her er noen av de beste vertene for Moodle:

Beste leverandører av skyhosting:

Bortsett fra verter som er bra for bestemt populær CMS-programvare, kan du søke etter en leverandør basert på den tekniske karakteren av selve hostingingen.

Selvfølgelig er det også skyhosting. Cloud hosting gir deg i hovedsak et dedikert stykke serverressurser, gjennom virtuelle servere koblet sammen.

Fordi ressursene dine er private, kan du bruke dem mer fritt uten å bekymre deg for å påvirke den generelle serveren. Og de er sikrere.

But one of the best things about cloud hosting is that it's scalable: because you’re not as limited by physical hardware, you can start with a smaller amount of higher-quality resources and then scale up to larger and larger amounts as your site grows.

Det er naturlig nok dyrere enn vanlig webhotell, men mye rimeligere enn dedikert hosting.

Her er noen gode nettskyleverandører:

Beste dedikerte hostingleverandører:

På den lappen: dedikerte verter er gode hvis du har en større virksomhet og trenger den mest premium hosting du kan få hendene på.

Dedikerte servere er slik de høres ut: de er hele servere dedikert utelukkende til den betalende kunden, og deles med ingen andre.

Men vær forsiktig: selv om du er villig til å betale opp for premium-tjeneste, vil du gjøre det sørg for at du investerer i den beste dedikerte serveren for deg.

Her er noen av de beste leverandørene av dedikerte servere:

Beste PHP-hostingleverandører:

Nå, bortsett fra å se på forskjellige typer hosting, eller på verter som er bedre for visse innholdsstyringssystemer, kan du se på verter som er bedre på bestemte språktyper.

PHP er et veldig kraftig skriptspråk som brukes til å bygge noen av de mest besøkte nettstedene i verden, og visse verter gir gode funksjoner og støtte for å utvikle nettsteder i PHP.

Noen av de beste leverandørene av PHP-hosting er her:

Beste Java-leverandør:

Alternativt kan du se på verter som passer bra for Java. Java er et av de mest populære nettutviklingsspråkene bortsett fra PHP, og brukes ofte som et alternativ til det. Det er spesielt bra for interaktivt innhold og mobilapper.

Du gjettet det. Her er noen av de beste vertene for Java:

Beste ASP.NET vertsleverandører:

Til slutt, det er det ASP.NET. Det er ikke akkurat et språk, men et rammeverk for nettapplikasjoner (som bruker .NET-språket) og spesielt bra for dynamiske prosjekter.

ASP.NET hosting er litt mer nisje, men det er definitivt verter som er bedre egnet for det enn andre, og til og med verter som er utmerket for ASP.NET-hosting spesielt.

Noen av disse vertene:

Det er tydelig at det finnes mange forskjellige typer hosting der ute - men hvis alle disse hørtes for overveldende ut for deg, bør du sannsynligvis gi oppmerksomheten til delt webhotell.

Det kan fortsatt gi den beste kombinasjonen av overkommelighet og funksjonalitet, og det er derfor det er den mest etterspurte typen vertsplan.

Best HIPAA hosting:

If your website will be handling (U.S.) healthcare information at all, you can’t just have any old hosting.

You can’t just slip by with “more secure” hosting, either.

No, you need to have hosting that’s compliant with HIPAA, which is the regulations for how healthcare information is handled digitally.

HIPAA-compliant hosting is niche, so you can’t just get it from any web host.

Luckily, I’ve investigated the best HIPAA-compliant hosting providers: you can view the full list of the best here. These are the best 3:

Best Joomla hosting:

If you want to run your site with a powerful content management system, you have plenty of options.

But you might not want a CMS that’s too easy, like WordPress, or one that’s too hard, like Drupal.

Joomla is a great intermediary CMS: it’s got a manageable learning curve for the less familiar, is easy for those with experience, and allows for powerful site management.

Du kan sjekke ut my list of the best Joomla hosting here. And for your convenience, here are the 3 best companies for hosting Joomla:

Best Node.js hosting:

For those who want to host dynamic projects, apps, and websites, it’s worth looking into Node.js hosting.

Node.js is a runtime environment for JavaScript. It’s lightweight, fast, stable, and widely used. Plus, if you already work in web development, it’s not too hard to learn how to use.

Node.js ticks off so many boxes that it’s become popular among many high-profile corporations, like GoDaddy, Netflix, Walmart, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and more.

So here’s my full list of the best Node.js hosting providers, and here’re the top 3 of those providers to save you time:

Best ecommerce hosting:

Everyone wants hosting for their website. And do they all want hosting for hobby sites?

A few, sure. But a huge portion of them want hosting for their BUSINESS.

And that means finding hosts that can support transactions, the possibility of scaling up, and can perform well. Not to mention hosts that are friendly towards ecommerce software or include their own built-in.

If you’re going to host a site for business, it’s super important you find the best one. Because if your host causes website issues, that can translate directly to lost sales, and bad customer experiences.

So if you want to find the best ecommerce hosting, check out my full list of the top 10 providers. Until then, here’re the top 3:

Best Wiki hosting:

Wanting to host a wiki is far from common.

But it’s an established tradition (of a sorts), and one that can prove incredibly useful in certain areas—whether that’s for hobbyists or the workplace.

But as it’s rarer to seek wiki hosting, you can expect that a normal list of the best web hosting may not be a perfect fit.

Some hosts prioritize support for Wiki management software, or are high performers that can accommodate wiki software without a hitch.

Så sjekk ut a full accounting of the best wiki hosting providers here. As a preview, these are the 3 best:

Og på den lappen…

What’s the best hosting for my country?

While this article is mostly relevant everywhere, it should go without saying that it can’t be perfectly accurate for everyone.

In particular, where you live may have some variation. Some local hosting providers could offer deals and performance better than more mainstream, global providers, for example.

Or, even global providers could be uniquely better in your country than others.

So let’s check out of the best web hosting in a few countries.

Best web hosting in India:

India has tons of internet users, and an increasingly robust hosting industry stepping up to support them.

The best hosting in India includes a mix of Indian hosts and global providers that have special offerings for Indian businesses and websites.

Sjekk ut my full review of India’s 12 best web hosting companies here. Otherwise, here are the top 3:

Best web hosting in Australia:

Australia has a relatively unique topography, as countries go. Remember, Australia is not just a country—it’s a continent!

Given its massive size, it’s not surprising that many people live in coastal metro areas and that much of the country is sparsely populated.

This also means running a high performing Australian site can be a bit tricky: you want to make sure your site can perform well for people living in areas with spotty internet.

So you can read a detailed list of Australia’s best web hosting here, but here are some of the best, to save you time:

Best web hosting in Canada:

Canada has a similarly unique topography as Australia: it’s a huge country, the world’s second biggest, with most of the population in denser metro areas, and others more spread out.

But despite internet performance varying by area, Canada has a robust population of internet users…and a large number of hosting providers.

So on the one hand, you need to find a host that can perform well for Canadian users, but you also have to cut through the options to find a host that’s good for you.

Her er the full list of Canada’s best hosting providers. But to be quick, here are the top options to check out:

How to choose the best web hosting service?

Til tross for info-dump på andre typer webhotell der oppe, har til og med bare vanlig webhotell et bredt spekter.

Du kan se noe av det fra dekket elementene: noen prioriterer WordPress mer. Andre prioriterer enkelhet. Og andre er bedre på funksjoner.

What we prioritize while reviewing a hosting service are the following paradigms:

Priser og funksjoner

Budget while selecting a hosting service is essential to your motive. The features usually go hand-in-hand to what you pay.

There’s also the theory that if you pay more, you get more but there’s also a difference between what you want and what you require.

Brukervennlighet

Newcomers are always welcome in the hosting community but innovation happens so fast that the learning curve keeps getting steeper. Which is why we test to find out how the average guy figures things out.

Sikkerhet

An underrated aspect of a hosting service. Most companies get it done with an SSL. Others offer an entirely custom solution. After all, you need to know what works best for you.

Kundeservice

When you get tired of figuring stuff out yourself or get into some kind of trouble, customer support is your best chance. Whether it is guides, chat or email support, it can be measured.

Hvis du er helt ny eller en hobbysnekker, kan det være verdt å prioritere “brukervennlige funksjoner” som nettstedbyggere, nettstedstatistikk, etc.

Og hvis prisen er kostnad, kan du gå til hvilken vert som er billigst, men har anstendig oppetid. Du kan installere WordPress på det gratis, eller et annet CMS, og administrere et nettsted med lite ekstra betaling.

Hvis du trenger flere råd, anbefaler jeg deg å lese vår guide til hvordan vi gjennomgår webhotellfirmaer—Det er mye bra overlapp som hjelper deg å velge.

Recap: The Best Web Hosting for 2021

Selv om det å finne den beste webhotellet kanskje hadde vært skremmende i starten, forhåpentligvis denne listen bidro til å forenkle ting.

Det må være en selvfølge at du trenger å gjøre din egen undersøkelse om hvilken vert som er best for deg.

Og selv om jeg står ved denne rangeringen som en god HELT rangering, vil den ikke være den beste passformen for alle.

Noen av dere prioriterer kanskje de lave kostnadene for funksjonssett InterServer or DreamHost. Andre kan like enkelheten og effektiviteten til Bluehost, og så videre, og så videre.

Slik denne listen står nå, synes jeg det er en ganske god start. Alle disse vertene er gode alternativer for webhotell, men hver har sine egne styrker.

Bluehost er sannsynligvis den beste enkle, men pålitelige verten: priser og funksjoner er i orden, ytelsen er veldig bra, og den utmerker seg med brukervennlighet og kundesupport.

FastComet er en unik vert som har bare EN plan med mange funksjoner. Det er også en flott allrounder, men spesielt bra for handelen eller verdi-kunden.

Du kan prøve alle disse i minst tretti dager, og i noen tilfeller lenger - så ikke vent. Gledelig vert!

Get the Best Hosting Tips & Tricks
Abonnementet ditt kunne ikke lagres. Vær så snill, prøv på nytt.
Abonnementet ditt har vært vellykket.
X
de Deutschfr Françaiszh-CN 简体中文zh-TW 繁體中文ar العربيةhr Hrvatskida Dansknl Nederlandsen Englishel Ελληνικάiw עִבְרִיתhi हिन्दीid Bahasa Indonesiait Italianoja 日本語ko 한국어no Norsk bokmålpl Polskipt Portuguêsro Românăru Русскийes Españolsv Svenskatr Türkçevi Tiếng Việt